Monday, September 29, 2008

Words of Bigotry

WARNING: this blog post has some words that may offend you. None of these words are written in the context of intending offense but if you have such a low tolerance that you cannot see some words in print without having an aneurysm, turn away. Maybe visit T-Shirt Hell or T-Shirt Hell for Kids and desensitize yourself. Then come back.

Last week, at work, we had some very inappropriate conversations. It all stemmed from a risqué new catch phrase the company is thinking of using on the home page. I'm not going to say what it is. If it makes it to production, you'll see it. If not, you won't.

So, when I got to work and saw this phrase, for some reason, I totally missed its WTF factor and glossed over it. Then one of my co-workers looked at me and said, "OMB, is that really going to say this!?" (OMB: Oh, My Blog!)

I was suddenly aware that I had missed this and also came down with a case of mild shock and a serious need to jab some humor, lest this go without ridicule.

This is when all of the developers, designers and everyone else who is not related to marketing came over and expressed their OMBs and WTFs. As one developer so aptly put it, "Oh, shit! LOL!"

Hearing the scoffs of nearly the entire staff during the morning meeting, our marketing expert decided to show us a slide show, depicting our structure for talking about the company both internally and externally. This was to show us how they come up with the language they use.

And this is when we had our HR nightmare moment.

We all followed along with the presentation, slowly coming to terms with the vision for how we present ourselves to the public, when suddenly a slide bore the phrase, "don't be retarded."

Now everyone chimes in a note.

"What!?"
"Um.... that's not ok..."
"I actually find that offensive. This is a personal matter to me. That's not cool."

"This is just internal." Says the head of marketing.

"No, really, that's not OK, even internally."
"Yeah, that's like saying, don't be a Jew", says the resident Jewish guy.
"Yeah, or don't be a nigger...." says another. Then this person turns to the one dark skinned person we have in our company. "And I mean that purely as a bad taste example. This is totally inappropriate." Then he looks embarrassed.

After the presentation, a few of us gather together and have a pretty nice discussion on slang bigotry and its adoption into mainstream media--and what is becoming accepted and what will never be acceptable. This conversation had everything, awkward pauses, honest humor, insightful realizations, and a conclusive visit to T-Shirt Hell. Among other conclusions, we found that just about any name can be derogatory and sometimes it just depends on who is speaking and how the name is presented. Context is key, but some words immediately strike bad chords with people, no matter what.

At some point in the conversation, the common misconception that some derogatory words are being 'taken back' by the oppressed came up. Although I had not thought too much on this before, I realized that this concept is complete bullshit. At least in practice. I think it's a good theoretical plan, but it fails in reality. Why, you ask?

You can't fight bigotry using mass media when bigots own mass media. I am referring, of course, to television, music and movies, where propagation of bigotry is most effective and does the most damage in shaping pop-culture and defining acceptable linguistic patterns.

The characters in the media who use derogatory words on themselves in a joking or playful manner are nearly always represented as undereducated or otherwise satirical characters. You are supposed to laugh at these people and think poorly of them. This ends up making the concept of reclaiming these words into a joke. You never hear intellectuals in the media using derogatory words in this way.

If James Earl Jones started referring to his children as "his niggers", people would freak out. But Puff Daddy can sing about it because he's from the hood and people from the hood are supposed to be undereducated and bad-to-the-bone, anti-PC and righteous about it. Now, Puff Daddy might be a brilliant mo-fo. He might be an intellectual genius. But he doesn't sell intellectual genius. The character he sells is the stereotype. This pattern continues for sexual preference, any skin color, religious leaning, gender or any other of the countless ways people are different.

Now, we get into dark realms when we start talking about what 'They' (referring to any group of people) prefer to be called. Some groups prefer one thing, others something else. The simple fact is that language is deciphered internally by the individual. Your reaction to the language people use depends on your personal experiences. These days, people from all walks of life can grow up within all other walks of life. Just because you fit a physical stereotype doesn't mean that you even relate to it the same way someone else with the same (or a similar) physical does.

Some people profess that you shouldn't refer to "Native Americans" as "Indians" because it's offensive. But really, Native American is just as offensive to some. Obviously, the original inhabitants of this continent never considered themselves Indian, because, hey, look at a map. But this continent isn't America to some of them either. Through the ages, people have made up countless names (Red Indians, American Indians, the American Indian race, Original Americans, First Nations, Indigenous Peoples of America, Amerindians, Amerinds) but it's all just more inaccurate and bigoted labeling (read more about the controversy on Wikipedia). An Apache or Sioux is an Apache or Sioux. But since people are so fond of generalized labels (mostly because very specific labels are cumbersome to acquire and to say), these names rarely come up.

And what am I?

I like to think of myself as a Pangaean American. My ancestors go all the way back.

OK, this is getting long winded and digressing into too many tangents. Let me just end by saying this:

I'm all for people reclaiming insults with humor and gusto. I hope it will work someday. But as long as Hollywood can pay Jackie Chan and Chris Tucker to make racial slurs at one-another, it's all still an insult and nobody is going to take a verbal reclamation seriously. If we really want to change how people view these words, we need to start by teaching our children that the media can't be trusted for acquiring communication skills. Then we need to change the media.

9 comments:

One Reader said...

Sir, you humble me. I have never been able to express this facet of my own thinking in anything resembling coherent thought and you put it out there brilliantly. Please accept my humble "Well Said."

The Mommy said...

Tough subject. Great job taking it on!

cIII said...

I'm still looking for a T-Shirt for the Tater that has a picture of a Donkey with the Circle and Slash through it. The text reads "I am Not a Drug Mule."
Our next trip that requires Plane Travel should be great Fun.

Captain Dumbass said...

"Teaching our children..." that one is going to be interesting. My children are mixed race, white and Asian so they are going to face issues I don't even know how to begin to explain. We're lucky that the area we live in is very mixed and it's becoming the norm. Hell, in my son's pre-school class I'd say a good half of the kids are mixed. Still, the race issue will come up at some point. Good post today, SDN.

Sleep Deprivation Ninja said...

Yeah, teaching our kids isn't a cake-walk. It's just way more accessible than changing the whole of public media.
But, yeah, I didn't even go into the issues of mixed ancestry. There's an exhibit at the Wing Luke Asian Museum in Seattle and it's all about the phrases, questions and issues that come up for people of mixed backgrounds. You get people thinking you are Filipino or Hawaiian, or Vietnamese, when really, you might be part Chinese, part Korean. It's such a stupid game. At some point, people have got to just give up on it and refer to people as people.

jenboglass said...

Whoa. This is deep. I'm at work so I can't read this properly. I will return tonight. But I'm no ninja so you'll see or hear me coming. I don't exactly sneak up on people.

Also, in the first couple of lines you mentioned you were at work. You want to know something strange? Whenever I think of you, I think of you on heelies at work speeding past someone else to use the urinal. Strange what sticks in our minds. I'll be back. With a thud.

jenboglass said...

I second the emotion of One Reader, your first commentor. You put this eloquently here on your page. I don't find it useful at all to use race as a descriptor of anyone.

I think it's a natural human tendency to want to group things or sort things for our minds to make sense of it. But this doesn't need to apply to our fellow human beings. I am caucasian and a woman, but that's not all that identifies me.

No one is born a bigot. We've all heard that. I do agree with you though that these changes need to happen globally, especially with all media and entertainment.

I don't know how you made it through this meeting without cringing something fierce. I don't know, maybe you did. I applaud you for writing this.

Sleep Deprivation Ninja said...

Oh, believe me. There was a lot of cringing and offense being taken and expressed. That line is no longer in that slide show.

Alissa said...

I love you, SDN!